|
Nederland's
Nathan Lazarus Skatepark is on the verge of opening, after five years
of effort. I've attempted to distill some
of what we learned through the advocacy process in hopes that others
can learn from our successes and from our mistakes. Our experience is
probably most applicable to small communities (Nederland's population
is around 1,500).
Nederland's skateboarders worked hard to stay in the community's eye. Seasoned advocates catalog their participation whenever they local teens are engaged in the project.
Beginnings
Nederland
can be a great place to live, but let’s face it; if you’re
a teen, possibilities for fair-weather leisure time activity are
pretty limited. Let’s see, there’s video games, hanging
out, video games, hanging out …
In
November of 2003, a group of Teens and older supporters began meeting
under the guidance of the staff of a local non-profit organization
TEENS, Inc., to do something about this situation; their goal was the
construction of a free public skatepark in Nederland.
In
April of 2004, the teens and their supporters packed a meeting of the
Nederland Board of Trustees, where they gave a multimedia
presentation and convinced the Board to support the project and to
site it on town-owned land adjacent to the Teen Center (owned and
operated by TEENS, Inc.). Unfortunately, the town had no money, so
the land, and a later commitment of some fill dirt and landscaping
help from the Public Works Director, was all the support that would
come from that quarter.
The
advocates hadn't really thought beyond making their case to the town
board, and the effort stagnated for a few months, until the
facilitator, Kevin Brazanskas, quit to move out of state, and
attempted to recruit some additional community members to the cause
and to reengage the group before leaving. He reconvened the group in
late August of 2004; I was one of those invited to attend the
meeting, and this marks my first involvement with the project.
More
than anything else, the success of our project is the result of
unshakable belief in our ultimate success and of unswerving
commitment to the project. One thing that successful advocacy efforts
seem to have in common, is that they have one or two ultra-committed
individuals, who devote enormous amounts of time to organize and lead
the cause. When, in the course of the first months of my involvement
with our project, I didn't see any one else stepping forward to
assume that role, and knowing that the project would never succeed
without someone doing so, I decided to take it on myself. I never
asked the group if they'd like me to do this, but staged a "friendly
takeover," by taking the initiative in all areas of the project.
This ultimately meant considerable sacrifice for my family, but the
dreaded "choose between me and the skatepark" ultimatum
never came from my wife, and indeed my wife and kids served as
volunteers of last resort throughout the effort; someone from the
family could always be counted upon to step up and help, at times
when no one else was available.
Nathan Lazarus, the skatepark's namesake, takes his shift at the earth mover.
There
was no Skatepark Development Guide available at that time, but
there was valuable information available on the web; I modified
someone's sample community survey, and we placed the questionnaires
in skateshops and at the Teen Center, and got the local middle-senior
high school to distribute them in their monthly mailing. The data
from these questionnaires, while by no means a statistically valid
sampling, was invaluable later, when it came time to write grants.
We
contacted other Colorado municipalities, where skateparks had been
built, and found most very willing to share information. The Parks
and Recreation Director of Carbondale wrote us a great letter that we
used over and over again to illustrate the positive impact that a
skatepark can have in a small community. The City of Boulder Parks
Department not only answered all of my questions, but let me come in
and pour over the blueprints to their park, as I attempted to get a
grasp of the scope of what we were attempting. These and other
communities, large and small, shared their experience with
maintenance costs and procedures.
After
becoming involved, I immediately began pushing to increase the scope
of the project, ultimately doubling the size of the proposed
skatepark. I contacted the City of Boulder (which owns the reservoir
adjacent to the park) to inquire about the possibility of acquiring
additional land for the project, and this ultimately resulted in an
intergovernmental agreement between the two municipalities that
included a land transfer (this took a year). This meant, of course, a
lot more money to raise and a longer timeline, but resulted in a park
large enough to be a destination skatepark (you're all planning a
Nederland trip, right?).
Half-way
into the skatepark campaign, the town's mayor, Chris Perret, lost a reelection bid,
and he showed up at the NEDSK8 office the following day, saying he
wanted to devote his free time to getting the skatepark built. He
became the super-volunteer that every project like this needs:
someone willing to show up for every fundraising event, to help set
up, break down and facilitate the effort in any way he can. Chris
Perret also knew many people in the community, and wasn't afraid to
hit them up for donations. Our ultimate success owes a lot to his
efforts.
We
were fortunate not to encounter any organized opposition to our
plans. The town government displayed an ambivalent attitude towards
us, appreciative of the volunteer effort that did for the town what
it didn’t have the resources to do for itself, yet uneasy with
the fact that we were beyond its control and pushing a project that
was not near the top of its priorities. There was one Trustee,
appointed to fill a vacancy well after the project was underway, who
bitterly opposed anything and everything that came before the town
Board concerning the skatepark project, but he was unable to derail
it. We’ve seen two administrations come and go, since first
approaching the town government for support (how time flies!), and a
third set of Trustees, now sitting, has been very supportive.
A
few of our biggest challenges
The site chosen for
our park had a lot of things going for it: proximity to the local
Teen Center, Town ownership, waterfront views, accessibility ... but
it also held hidden challenges that we should have uncovered early
on and didn't. (On the other hand, the fact that a critical problem
with the site - the spring water table was higher than the frost
line - was discovered too late to change course, forced creative
thinking to solve the problem). It would have been wise to have an
engineer evaluate the site at the outset. I also discovered, not
long before construction was scheduled to begin, that the
subdivision in which the site was located had never been recorded,
and that the land had in fact been leased by the Town to TEENS,
Inc.; neither the Town nor TEENS, Inc. was aware of this! Result?
Yikes - a last-minute scramble to get a survey, steer a replat
through the Town bureaucracy and record a revised subdivision,
before we could build. I should have examined the records much
earlier in the project.
Local governmental
inertia was a major headache. A small town with a very small staff
doesn't necessarily welcome another park to insure and maintain, and
that staff won't necessarily work hard to facilitate its
construction. Our town’s Public Works Director was very
supportive, whereas our Town Administrator was not, and the latter’s
lack of follow-though and commitment probably added a year to the
project timeline. Cultivate as good a relationship as possible with
your town's staff, and try to impart your vision to them.
Volunteers help out to level the decks.
Some people get great mileage from citizen
volunteers, but that wasn’t our experience. After a while, you
get frustrated with commitments that are never followed through on,
and you just do everything yourself. (That's one reason you need the
über volunteer; one person can only do so much, no matter how
committed). Kids are particularly challenging. You need teen
involvement in your project, for youth involvement sells your
project to funders like puppies on a magazine cover sell magazines,
and it’s mostly about the kids, right? Problem is, the teens
lose interest quickly; they'd much rather skateboard on crappy
makeshift ramps than labor to build themselves a nice park. So ...
photograph the hell out of their initial participation, before they
lose interest and you never see them again, and milk it for all it's
worth.
Fundraising
The
funds for our park came from donation jars, special events, grants, a
donor brick campaign and direct solicitations/fund drives.
Donation
jars won't build your park, but they are important. They advertise
your project, so make the jars colorful and informative. They provide
an opportunity for the small donor to give without embarrassment, for
a kid to donate her allowance, for a merchant to publicly show
civic-mindedness. We raised about $5,000 through this medium. I
designed a free-standing stand, consisting of three skateboard decks,
screwed to plywood triangles with the points cut off. A discarded 5
gallon plastic water jug was bolted to the upper triangle, with
colorful labels attached. A brochure holder was affixed to the
outside of one of the decks, in the earlier models, or suspended
between the decks in later ones (more out of the way, hence less
subject to damage). The jars need to be near the store's cash
register, where people have money in hand. Our best locations:
grocery store, pizza parlor, cafés. Worst: drug store, police
department (got ripped off, if you can believe it), skate shop
(ditto).
Special
events provide good publicity, but may not yield much cash. Setting
up a tent at a festival and expecting people to stop and donate is a
lost cause. Don't bother, unless you have t-shirts to sell, and even
then, it's questionable. I spent far too many days at festivals,
sitting behind a table to collect a paltry sum in donations. Unless
you have a lot of dedicated volunteers, a silent auction isn't worth
the incredible amount of work it entails. Bake sales can be well
worth the small amount of planning that goes into them. You won't
raise thousands at a bake sale, but you can raise a few hundred bucks
a pop, and they provide good exposure. Benefit concerts can be
profitable, but nailing down a name band for a gig can be like
chasing your tail. If alcohol is served (sad, but true) and if the
band plugs your project regularly from the stage, you may make out
alright. This can be a good way to raise some initial seed money,
when attaining the hundreds of thousands you will need to build your
park seems all but impossible; that’s what set us on our way.
Pay attention to the return on the investment of your volunteer time;
is the event worth it, or would you be better off spending the time
going door to door, or making phone calls?
Grants
were our largest source of funding by far. Foundations have money to
give to worthy causes like yours, but first you have to convince them
you will succeed. Get organized, form a corporation and apply for
501(c)(3) status. Do it early in the life of the project; it took us
eight months to hear back from the IRS, and even that took assistance
from our congressional representative. I completed the application
myself; it might have been smarter to seek a CPA or lawyer to do it
for us, but it's not rocket science, and mainly entails just
following directions.
Next,
you need to show local support. We set our sights on a large grant
from the state's lottery trust fund, knowing that receipt of a grant
of this size (up to $200,000) would accord us instant legitimacy in
the eyes of private foundations, but failed on our first application,
because we had not raised enough local money. We appealed to the
community to help us raise $25,000 in time to reapply for this grant.
I think we raised $17,000 in a few week's time - short of our goal,
but enough to demonstrate adequate local support for the project, and
we were awarded the full $200,000 on our second attempt. We now had
attained critical mass, and other grants followed in quick
succession. We learned a valuable lesson from this: people will
respond to your donation request, if you have a compelling need for a
finite amount of money within a specific time frame.
Writing
a successful grant application isn't hard. Some keys to success:
-
Make as compelling
a case as you can for your project. Foundations are in the business
of dispensing money toward good causes; help them do their job, by
providing them with a good solid project to support. Use the data in
Pete's Development Guide, backed up by your local survey
results, to help make your case.
-
Take the time to
format your application and make it look professional, with headers
and footers customized for the particular grant you are applying
for. Though I was a novice at grant writing, at least one foundation
thought I'd hired a professional grant writer, because I made the
effort to polish the application.
Donor
brick campaigns are a common way for organizations to raise money for
capital projects. We probably started our drive too early in the
project; there were some early sales, then the majority of our brick
purchases came late, after people were convinced the park would
really be built. This proved to be labor-intensive. Lots of time
spent designing, printing, distributing brochures. Every purchaser
received a confirmation letter with a PhotoShop rendering of what
their brick would look like. The orders had to be painstakingly
formatted, and there was lots of back-and-forth with the engraver on
the logo bricks. We raised about $30,000 through bricks, with
expenses of about $6,000. One nice thing about the bricks, is that
there is the potential for ongoing sales, after the project is
complete. We are setting lots of blank bricks that can be replaced
with engraved ones from later sales.
The fresh manual pad. Yummy like chocolate.
We
held two productive fund drives. The first was the effort to raise
enough money to convince the lottery trust fund board that there was
strong local support for our project. The second came late, with the
builders scheduled to arrive and a large challenge grant about to
expire (the condition of the grant was that all the construction
funds had to have been raised). Both succeeded because there were
clearly defined goals with a compelling deadline. The last drive was
particularly exciting (challenge grants work!). We appealed to
supporters though e-mails and through letters in the local paper, and
I e-mailed out status updates nearly every day, with a fresh angle to
the appeal. Many in the community got caught up in the excitement;
strangers would stop me on the street, to ask how we were doing and
offer congratulations on progress, and at the end, there were at
least five parties that had told me to call them, if we were in
danger of coming up short - the community was not about to let us
fail. This was a wonderful experience.
Design
Another
Catch-22 situation: just as you need money before you have much of a
chance obtaining grants, and need the grants to show potential donors
you are for real, so you need a park design to show funders what you
need the money for, but need some serious money to pay for the
design. We charged ahead on faith, and put out a design/build RFP in
September of 2005, sending them to six premier skatepark builders.
Three responded with proposals. We evaluated the proposals in a
systematic manner: I defined some interview questions, and we
contacted four references for each company, assigning one reference
for each company to each of four board members. (This was to minimize
any differences in interviewing skills and any bias the interviewer
might have). I also drew up a scoring sheet for our directors to rate
each proposal, based upon how well the proposal met the requirements
of the RFP, how well the proposal met the needs of our community,
etc.. All the directors read and evaluated the RFPs, I compiled the
scores, and then we met to make a decision.
Once
a design/build firm was selected, we signed a contract for design
only; we had only $5K in the bank, so couldn't commit beyond the
design fee of $18K, and the $13K difference came out of my home
equity line of credit, which I loaned to NEDSK8, against the advice
of the other directors. I was probably the only director convinced
we'd succeed at that point, but what chance do you have, if you don't
believe in yourself? You have to commit to do whatever it takes. (We at SPS also don't recommend putting your house up to help fund the skatepark but we're sure thankful Randy did! -ed)
Airspeed's crew carefully shapes the coping.
We
did the typical series of public design meetings, led by an Airspeed
representative who flew out and spent ten days with us. A comparison
of the actual park with the original design that came out of those
meetings reveals radical differences; in the three intervening years,
there was plenty of time to rethink aspects of the design. The
initiative for some changes came from us, others from the designer,
some were necessitated by conditions found on-site; the result was a
better park than we'd have had if we'd been flush with cash and ready
to build immediately. Sometimes delays are a good thing.
Looking
Ahead
NEDSK8’s
agreement with the town stipulates that we are responsible for trash
collection and graffiti removal, while the town must do a yearly cure
‘n seal and handle major repairs. We’ve tried to minimize
the need for future repairs by prohibiting bikes and making the park
as robust as possible – we’ll see how that works out. Our
view that the town should be grateful enough at being handed a
half-million dollar skatepark to empty the trash cans at its own
facility wasn’t shared by the last administration; we hope to
revisit that question.
The
park will provide challenges and opportunities for TEENS, Inc,, the
organization that midwifed this project and continued to support
NEDSK8, after we matured enough to move forward on our own. The
skatepark is quite literally at its doorstep, and it will have to
learn to deal with the influx of skaters that might strain its
capacity to serve its young constituents. On the other hand, it opens
up opportunities to them for sponsorship of events and for fostering
teen mentoring, and will expose many new teens to the organization’s
programs.
A brick imprint adds inexpensive interest to the speed wall.
As
for NEDSK8, we are looking ahead at other possibilities for
fulfilling our mission of creating recreational opportunities for
area youth. We have discussed projects such as a bouldering park, a
Frisbee® golf course, a BMX course or a whitewater course. As
Nederland’s proposed Gateway Park is defined, we might choose
to develop one of its elements, such as a soccer field. We may have
to rethink our all-volunteer status, though; I’ve no regrets
about the thousands of hours of time I’ve donated to make our
skatepark project succeed, but my family does need to eat.
Final
Thoughts for the Skatepark Advocate
Don't
be under any illusion that this is anything but a long-term project,
needing your long-term commitment. I recall looking at other
skatepark advocacy efforts that had been going on for five years or
so, and smugly telling myself that we'd succeed much faster. Well,
here we are, just finishing up our project five years after those
first organizational meetings were held. It will take longer to build
your park than you think it will, and it will cost more (set your
fundraising target for what the park will cost several years down the
road, not what it will cost now). It will require more time and
sacrifice than you ever imagined ... and it will all be worth it.
Good Luck!
Randy
Lee
Executive
Director
NEDSK8,
Inc.
|