Chapter 4: Design

Wednesday, 19 September 2007
Article Index
Chapter 4: Design
Siting
Criteria: Access
Criteria: Visibility
Criteria: Comfort
Criteria: Diversity
Site Appraisals
Skatepark Design
Design in Brief
Skater's Needs
Environmental Needs
Construction Needs
Design Influences
Neighborhood Resistance
Local Skaters
Skatepark Experts
The Right Designer
RFQ's
RFP's
Landscape Architects
ACI Specs
ASTM Standards

Appraising Prospective Sites
Establishing a reasonable site selection process is the only way to ensure that the prospective site is the most appropriate place for a skatepark. Advocates, many of whom spend years promoting a single facility, become mired in bureaucratic roadblocks when their selection criterion is challenged. It’s imperative that the criteria be established early on, properly vetted through bureaucratic channels, and publicized widely to the public. Without any of these steps, the site can easily be challenged under the common claim that due process was not followed.

Similarly, every action taken to identify both the criteria and the sites themselves should be carefully recorded so that should an audit of that process be required, either as mandated by protocol or to avoid a controversial public debacle, all facts and figures can be easily supported.

fyi_sidehead.jpg
SKATEPARK SYSTEMS
Finding a single site for the sole skatepark that will be expected to service a larger community is unrealistic. More and more cities are looking to comprehensive skatepark systems for maximum benefit.
Naturally, both the criteria and the site selections them-selves should be made as public as possible. (The more outreach one does during this stage, the more defensible the site becomes later if resistance is encountered.)

Scoring each potential site will question specific qualities about the site along the principles outlined above. For most skatepark sites the surveyor will observe the follow-ing traits:
  1. Does the site allow for separation from vehicular traffic, providing access for emergency situations and routine maintenance?
  2. Does the site provide unobstructed visibility by the non-skating public?
  3. Will the site attract active use?
  4. Can the site be modified to positively mitigate any community concerns such as noise and continual activity?
  5. Is the site close to public transportation?
  6. Is the site available for construction?
  7. Will the site favor redevelopment or additional development?
  8. Is the site adjacent to compatible uses and activities?
  9. Can the facility be expanded later?
  10. Does the site maintain adequate environmental buffers?

Sites being considered for larger skateparks may require additional criteria:

  • Does the site have access to essential amenities, such as a restroom and drinking fountain?
  • Does the site have available parking?
  • Does the site have available infrastructure for lighting?
  • Can the site support a large number of spectators? 
fyi_sidehead.jpg
SITE WORKSHEET
Use this handy worksheet for recording and comparing the merits of potential skatepark sites.
The results of these studies should be carefully documented. The results may be recalled as needed during public meetings regarding those sites that scored favorably.

There is no perfect way of finding the right place for your skatepark or skate spot. Sometimes an imperfect site will be pursued due to lots of community support although it fails on certain important qualities. However, advocates who remain steadfast in their principles will ultimately be rewarded with the healthiest skatepark communities.



Last Updated ( Wednesday, 13 February 2008 )